O

L

D

 

S

A

L

E

M

 

 

 

 

 

M

A

S

O

N

R

I

E

S:

 

D

A

T

I

N

G

 

S

C

A

L

E

S

 

æ æ

 

Dating Scales for the Masonries         

Winston-Salem, NC

 




INTRODUCTION

The goal of this work is to determine the appropriateness of chronological development of the masonries and their parameters in Winston-Salem’s buildings; as well as to create the masonries’ dating scales for this town.

The historical buildings in Winston-Salem have been dated with "The Official Guide Book" (see bibliography), which was used for the buildings and masonries dating as a most recent and most reliable source. So the methodology suggested in this work, can be used practically in a case of alterations on the buildings with masonry additions (for instance, infilling the door or window openings with brick, later erection of new walls, etc.). Such a case happened in Single Sisters’ House, where number of brick alterations was done in the early 1840s.

The base of the work was a set of data, which was accumulated through a field research that was done in May-June 2004. Samples of the material collection are represented here, where the selected inspection forms are shown. The same inspection forms were filled in at a site for each masonry. Such a methodology was successfully used before for similar researches in Moscow (Russia) and Philadelphia (PA).

The research covers almost all the brick houses in Winston-Salem, but cannot be considered as a comprehensive one. It was basically done on elevations, so the dating precision could be reduced for the interior walls. (For instance, the type of joint usually is different on the exterior and interior wall surfaces).

The united terminological system for the historical architectural details has not elaborated for USA yet. To avoid confusion of reading this text use the illustrated glossary with the selected terms.

Arches, foundations, special decorative patterns, fireplaces, chimneys, horizontal masonry sections and also vaults were not involved in the current research. The masonries that were used to infill the frame structures of the frame buildings also were not included in the given analyzes.

Application program “Analize-It” (version 1.69) was used for the statistical analyzes.


Using the dating methodology, we should always consider that the real chronological time period can be wider than it was determined with the research, because not all the historical buildings have survived (graphic #1).

DESCRIPTION OF THE MASONRY PARAMETERS

18th century mortar is off-white with a slightly grey shade. In the 19th century a mortar color was changed to off-white, with pinkish and reddish shades. The highest concentration of red pigment is in the mortar of the original (1861) part of the African Moravian Church, which has red color, slightly lighter of brick. Brick powder could be added to the mortar. One of the future investigations goals should be dedicated to determining whether the outside surface was pointed with red mortar at the façade side or if it was used over the entire masonry. In the first case it has a pure decorative function; in the second case a brick powder was added to mortar to increase its strength.

The building’s elevations in Winston-Salem did not have developed 3-dimentional decorative details. Absence of them was compensated using a black header pattern (figure #1). The black header bricks were produced at special locations in a brick kiln. After removing them from the stoves, the bricks appeared as regular size bricks with glossy black header surfaces. Black surface was slightly turned over (figure #2) to the four adjacent sides (about ½”). Used for the facade surface the Flemish masonry black headers were organized in a special kind of ornament. Together with the regular red stretchers they created an ornamental decorative effect on a flat wall. The walls erected with the black headers were more expensive than the walls with entire red surfaces. That is why some of the buildings’ different facades had different kinds of decorations. For instance, Winkler Bakery house has only three elevations decorated with black headers: North, West and South. East elevation, oriented to the back yard and unavailable for the public view, contains regular red headers.


Black headers were stopped in use in the 1810s, and in the 1820s they were not used on the brick buildings anymore. Chronologically last building where black headers can be seen is Laundry (1816) where black headers were located sporadically and did not create any special pattern.



Type of Bond is not actually a pattern. It is one of the main structural elements of a building. The pattern is a sign of a bond, like a temperature is not a sickness but one of the symptoms of a particular disease. A pattern allows us to judge masonry’s type, the structure and its features, such as layout or strength.

Together with English Cross bond (figure #3) the Flemish bond (figure #4) was considered as the strongest and structurally the most stable bond. At the same time more complicated and more expensive Flemish bond had higher decorative characteristics. That is why a lot of the front walls of buildings could be laid with Flemish bond and all the others – with Liverpool bond. Two buildings in Winston-Salem were created such a way: South Hall North addition (1824) and Anna Johanna Vogler house (1827).

The Liverpool bond (figure #5) was used in Winston-Salem in the 1820-1840s (registered cases). The latest use of a Flemish bond was in 1831 (Wash-Bake house, 463 Church St.). The determined time period changing from Flemish bond to the others was during the late 1820s and early 1830s.

The Common 5th course bond (figure #6) was used widely in the 1840s through 1860s.

The Running bond (figure #7) started to be used in the mid of the 19th century (not only in Winston-Salem, but around the USA). It has been one of the most popular bonds abroad (in the Western world) and it is named there as the “American Bond”.

The Common 6th course bond (figure #8) started being used commonly in the USA during the 1870s and also received the name “American Common bond” in the Western construction cultures. This kind of masonry became popular at the same time when machine made production of brick and use of Portland cement as a component of a mortar have started. Machine made brick had much higher density and strength. Adding Portland cement to a mortar also increased strength of a masonry and made it physically compatible to a brick.


The Type of a joint plays a significant role in dating of masonry. The Flush & Rodded type (figure #9) was used in the 18th and early 19th century in Winston-Salem. The last registered time of using this joint is 1816 (Laundry House).

The next chronological type was Struck  (figure #12), which in the 1810-1820s also could be Rodded, but later it appeared as pure Struck. Struck and Rodded (figure #10) typicallly was used only on a main elevation. For instance, the Eastern façade of Vogler House (700 South Main Street, 1819) was pointed with Struck and Rodded joint. All the other elevations were pointed with pure Struck joint: it was cheaper for the owner.

Changing from Flush to Struck did not happen at one day. Flush type existed together with slightly made, not deep struck. Over the time Struck became deeper and deeper until finally appeared as a pure struck joint type (Figures #11-13).

Together with Flush and Struck, the Weathered type of joint (figure #14) could be used on both  interior  and exterior surfaces of a wall. Like struck type of joint it was not deep in the 18th century and appeared full developed by the 1830s.

In the second third of the 19th century Double Struck type of joint (figure #15) existed for a few decades. It was done with a trowel and appeared as a corner in section.

DATING METHODOLOGIES
Two dating methodologies are suggested in this work. One of them is logical. It uses visual characteristics of a masonry and logical operation of them. Another one is dating with formula. None of them can be recommended as a preferable method. Anyone can select the one that she of he are more comfortable with. Experienced people can date masonry without using any of them.

The Dating formula was created using a database, which was collected from each building with a specially developed form. Multiple regression methodology was involved to calculate the formula. Particular parameters of masonry are the members of the dating formula. The square of correlation coefficient (R2) is 0.93. It means that 93% of cases are described with this formula. This is a very high value, which does not happen too frequently in historical statistical research.


Y=37.1336—0.3025x1+0.5720x2—2.5173x3+2.0737x4—2.6443x5-0.1443x6+3.6709x7+2.5082x8

Where:
Y – Dating (codes, table #1)

Variables:
x1 – Joint width (inches)
x2 – 10 courses with 10 joints (inches)
x3 – Brick length (inches)
x4 – Brick width (inches)
x5 – Brick height (inches)
x6 – Type of joint: 1 – Flush+Rodded,
2 – Weathered
3 – Struck+Rodded
4 – Double Struck
5 – Struck
x7 – Black header pattern: 1 – yes, 2 – no
x8 – Type of Bond:                                                                                           1 – Flemish
2 – Liverpool
3 – Common 5th course
4 – Running
5 – Common 6th course.

Table #1. Codes for Dates
Time Period Code Time Period Code
1601-1605      1      1751-1755     31
1606-1610      2      1756-1760     32
1611-1615      3      1761-1765     33
1616-1620      4      1766-1770     34
1621-1625      5      1771-1775     35
1626-1630      6      1776-1780     36
1631-1635      7      1781-1785     37
1636-1640      8      1786-1790     38
1641-1645      9      1791-1795     39
1646-1650      10    1796-1800     40
1651-1655      11    1801-1805     41
1656-1660      12    1806-1810     42
1661-1665      13    1811-1815     43
1666-1670      14    1816-1820     44
1671-1675      15    1821-1825     45
1676-1680      16    1826-1830     46
1681-1685      17    1831-1835     47
1686-1690      18    1836-1840     48
1691-1695      19    1841-1845     49
1696-1700      20    1846-1850     50
1701-1705      21    1851-1855     51
1706-1710      22    1856-1860     52
1711-1715      23    1861-1865     53
1716-1720      24    1866-1870     54
1721-1725      25    1871-1875     55
1726-1730      26    1876-1880     56
1731-1735      27    1881-1885     57
1736-1740      28    1886-1890     58
1741-1745      29    1891-1895     59
1746-1750      30    1896-1900     60

The Excel application program could be suggested for simplifying the calculation process.

Different kinds of bonds had different technological ways to meet the edges, i.e. corners of a house, door and window jambs, pilasters, etc. Flemish bond, as the most complicated one, had the biggest number of corner types. Eight of them were found in Winston-Salem. Sometimes more than one different types of corner were used on the same building. For instance, Vogler house has two of them: the First type was used for windows and house corners and the Fourth one was used for the front door. Three types were registered on the Laundry: First one for the front door, Third for the back door and Fourth for the windows. Corners for Liverpool, Common 5th course, Running and Common 6th course types of Bond are shown in the attachment #3.

IMPORTANT NOTE
Each time when we try to date a particular masonry we should remember about a possibility of reusing an older brick from the demolished buildings or their parts. That is why using only the brick sizes, color or surface character is not recommended for dating. The best way is to use all the parameters of masonry. The type of bond, mortar characteristics and type of joint can be considered as the most reliable signs, because they cannot be reused. Using them for a masonry dating is absolutely essential.

At the very beginning of a physical investigation of any particular building the local dating scales should be created based on the documentary dated parts, even if it is only for a single building. That relates not only to the brick parts, but also to all other details (doors, windows, floors, moldings, etc.), which can help to date the masonries.


 

 

Bibliography
1. Architecture and Ornament. By Antony Whit, Bruce Robertson. 1990.
2. Chronological scales for the Moscow masonries of the 16th – 19th centuries. By Igor Kiselev. Moscow: Rosrestavratsia, 1986, 1990, 1997 (three editions).
3. How to think about statistics. By John L. Phillips. W.H. Freeman and Company. NY, NY 2000.
4. Illustrated Building Glossary. By Roxanna McDonald. 1999
5. Introduction to Early American Masonry. By Harley J. McKee. Washington, D.C. 1973.
6. Old House Dictionary. By Steven J. Phillips. Washington, D.C. 1994.
7. Old Salem. The Official Guidebook. By Penelope Niven and Cornelia Wright. Old Salem, Inc. Winston Salem, NC. 2000.
8. Practical Statistics. By Russel Langley. Dover Publications, Inc. NY, NY 1970.
9. Statistics. By Alan Graham. London, UK 2002.

 

MUSEUM - TRAVEL
PRESERVATION

Wallpaper - Gateways - Necropolis - Landscape

Splinters Home

Please email to: vera.igor@gmail.com